Since they're all due back at the library this week, it's time to do that blog post I've been intending for a couple of weeks now. Since the new year began I've been rather effortlessly reading more non-fiction than usual. I'm not quite sure what this is all about - perhaps I'm choosing better non-fiction, or perhaps it's better written these days?
The books on this shelf are actually the 'to read' pile but that's ok.
The Golden Spruce by John Vaillant
The book's subtitled 'A True Story of Myth, Madness and Greed' and ultimately I think I would have liked it to focus on just one of those things. It would probably be over-ambitious to expect it to really illuminate all three. I ended up wanting to know more about the Golden Spruce itself and its role in Haida myth, more about Grant Hadwin's madness (some commentary from his wife would have been nice, although I can understand refusing to discuss one's estranged, presumed dead husband with a writer), and more about the greed that's characterized the forestry industry globally.
Last Lovers by William Wharton
William Wharton's the guy who said something I thought was totally profound about love: 'What is love? It is passion, admiration and respect. If you have two, you have enough. If you have all three, you don't have to die to go to heaven.' I was hoping reading this novel would help me track down exactly where he said it, but no such luck.
This is an odd novel merely by virtue of the way it's told, with alternating first-person narratives by the only two characters. One is a middle-aged American painter who is living illegally in a garret, having turned his back on corporate success, his wife and his children, at least temporarily. The other is a 70-something Parisienne who has suffered from hysterical blindness since she discovered her mother dead in the bath, having slit her wrists, when she was 14. The bizarre love affair that evolves between the two is just the teensiest bit too creepy to be heartwarming. Apparently Birdy is the one to read, so I'm not saying no to the notion of reading another of his novels.
Big Women by Fay Weldon
Fay is nothing if not reliable. Her cynical narratives of (mostly) English second-wave feminists are always witty treats, and this one is no exception. Stephanie, Nancy, Layla, Zoe, Daffy, Alice, and later, Zoe's daughter Saffron, live, love, strive, and survive in London, feuding, stealing each other's husbands and lovers, creating a publishing empire. Naturally the empire implodes, but most of the women survive and, well, carry on, older and wiser but no less witty.
Bud Inc. by Ian Mulgrew
Highly entertaining although quite astonishing in its bias. Funny that, with its focus on the medical marijuana market, two studies should come to my attention within a week of reading this book about the dangers of marijuana: one a New Zealand study focusing on higher incidences of lung cancer and another on damage to teeth and gums from heavy marijuana smoking (defined as one joint a day). Still, I am grateful to finally have read an explanation of the difference between indica and sativa.
Recently read will hopefully become a regular feature of this blog.
Showing posts with label books. Show all posts
Showing posts with label books. Show all posts
Monday, February 18, 2008
Recently read
Thursday, April 26, 2007
Read 'em and Weep - Scott Butki on books we should have loved
Great summary of the most over-hyped books in recent(ish) memory - including Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, Life of Pi, and (snort) The Celestine Prophecy.
I 'dugg' an article for the first time (is dugg the past tense of 'digg'?) and couldn't find an appropriate category so filed it under "Science - Space." That should get some chins wagging. (See article below; digg tried to insist it had already been dugg - they're having difficulty distinguishing between "Read IT and Weep" and "Read 'Em and Weep" obviously.)
The article was from Blogcritics - another first - hadn't seen that site before. Where have I been? Reading books, I guess. Speaking of reading: Geraldine Brooks' March was quite wonderful - weakened somewhat in the last third by her decision to suddenly present Mrs. March as the narrator, when the first two thirds of the novel were all told from Mr. March's point of view. Based on Louisa May Alcott's father rather than her husband (Little Women was fairly autobiographical apparently), I was astonished to discover her dad had 'invented' recess. Children everywhere need to know this. And Greg Hollinghead's Bedlam was quite wonderful too, a fictional account of tea merchant James Tilly Matthews, confined to a notorious lunatic asylum in the late 18th, early 19th centuries for his attempts to prevent war between France and England shortly after the French Revolution.
read more | digg story
I 'dugg' an article for the first time (is dugg the past tense of 'digg'?) and couldn't find an appropriate category so filed it under "Science - Space." That should get some chins wagging. (See article below; digg tried to insist it had already been dugg - they're having difficulty distinguishing between "Read IT and Weep" and "Read 'Em and Weep" obviously.)
The article was from Blogcritics - another first - hadn't seen that site before. Where have I been? Reading books, I guess. Speaking of reading: Geraldine Brooks' March was quite wonderful - weakened somewhat in the last third by her decision to suddenly present Mrs. March as the narrator, when the first two thirds of the novel were all told from Mr. March's point of view. Based on Louisa May Alcott's father rather than her husband (Little Women was fairly autobiographical apparently), I was astonished to discover her dad had 'invented' recess. Children everywhere need to know this. And Greg Hollinghead's Bedlam was quite wonderful too, a fictional account of tea merchant James Tilly Matthews, confined to a notorious lunatic asylum in the late 18th, early 19th centuries for his attempts to prevent war between France and England shortly after the French Revolution.
read more | digg story
Saturday, June 24, 2006
Updike in defense of the tangible book
The New York Times Sunday Book Review, which arrives in my email box late every Saturday night, features this week a charming and passionate essay by John Updike called 'The End of Authorship' that refutes Kevin Kelly's contention in The New York Times Magazine of May 14, 2006, that the world will be a better and more democratic place when books go the way of music and are customizable as music now is, when readers will be able to select snippets of novels and create their own anthologies just as they can now create their own playlists for their iPods. The Updike essay appeared June 25, 2006.
Authors will, says Kelly, make money for their appearances, from workshops, and from interfacing directly with their readers. Updike points out that he rarely encountered one of his readers in the first 10 or 15 years after his work started being published. He also waxes eloquent on the joy of visiting bookstores, although not as eloquently as I could wax. Or perhaps, just as eloquently but in a different way.
The tactile experience of reading is not to be dismissed. Although I probably wouldn't have had the patience to slit the pages of a book two by two, I can certainly understand, given the weight and quality of the paper on which those books were printed and bound in their signatures, that for those a little less impatient than me, there was a ceremonial aspect to sitting at a lovely solid wood desk and carefully slicing along the folded edge with a utensil dedicated for this purpose. As one of my 18th and 19th Century lit profs said, in the days before television, reading was considered entertainment for the literate masses, and those who had the leisure to read at all were not daunted by the prospect of a long novel - they were, rather, delighted by the prospect of one that would occupy their leisure time for many days to come.
A real book is also portable, and while it's not difficult to imagine that technology will soon devise tiny perfect little optical readers that can be grabbed on the way out the door just like a book, they will NOT be just like books. Having worked in more than one bookstore on more than one occasion, I can tell you that for those who are passionate about reading, every shipment is like Christmas. In fact, the last time I worked in a bookstore I was forbidden to go anywhere near the shipments unless I was prepared to actually receive and shelve the books, since I'd fallen into the bad habit of opening all the totes, exclaiming with joy, and leaving a huge mess behind me. The design factor is not to be discounted in the book publishing industry - and frankly, web design has a long way to go before it can catch up with the sophistication of the book and magazine industries design capabilities (mainly because just about anyone can get some sort of web site up and going these days, regardless of their lack of comprehension of typography, graphic elements, and what constitutes good design, coupled with a blissful ignorance of its basic premise, The Golden Rule). I have seen books without even a title on their front covers fly off the shelves - there was a series of naughty books by a guy called John Colleton in the 70s that regularly disappeared in moments after being shelved based on their covers alone.
The prospect of reading even more megapixels isn't an appealing one. Even the experience of buying books online, convenient though it is, isn't as much fun as browsing in a bookstore. Nor am I anywhere near as likely to buy a book by an unknown author online, no matter how good its reviews. I certainly can't imagine buying a dozen or more books by authors unknown to me online. And yet I had no hesitation whatsoever to scoop up at least two dozen in the Virago women's writers series when they were on sale at David Mirvish Books in Toronto a decade or two ago. The covers, the chance to glance at the first paragraph, the fact that they were all on sale for less than half price - I was sold in no time. And I read every one of them too. The online book buying experience has really only one consolation for me - I have usually forgotten that I've placed an order by the time the books arrive, and thus conclude it's either my birthday or Christmas when they do magically appear. That's the point at which I get a little bit of the same excitement I get by fondling and poring over them in an actual store, accepting or rejecting them based on their covers, their first paragraphs, the back jacket blurb - and the amount of show-through in the paper on which they're printed. Buying online will also never give the joy of that spontaneous exchange of information called a conversation, either - the sort of conversation that often happens in the retail outlet when the person you're paying for the book has read it him- or herself - or the person in the line behind you spots it over your shoulder and tells you how much you're going to enjoy it. These conversations can take place wherever you go with your actual, real, live, fondle-able, tearable, write-in-able book, when someone sees you carrying it and you're suddenly embarked - often in the most unlikely places - on an oral ramble through the merits of the latest Peter Carey, My Life as a Fake, versus his earlier work, like Oscar and Lucinda or even - gasp - The Illywhacker.
It's a peculiar form of intellectual democracy when you feel you are constrained from speaking to someone because their ears are plugged with little headsets. What will happen when we can no longer make eye contact with our fellow public transit users because their eyes are also engaged in reading the text (downloaded from the internet and custom-selected by them) that's scrolling past (speed adjustable of course)?
"The printed, bound and paid-for book was — still is, for the moment — more exacting, more demanding [than information posted on the internet], of its producer and consumer both. It is the site of an encounter, in silence, of two minds, one following in the other's steps but invited to imagine, to argue, to concur on a level of reflection beyond that of personal encounter, with all its merely social conventions, its merciful padding of blather and mutual forgiveness. Book readers and writers are approaching the condition of holdouts, surly hermits who refuse to come out and play in the electronic sunshine of the post-Gutenberg village," says Updike. It's precisely because I want to read a book in the sunshine that I won't be giving up buying books anytime soon.
Authors will, says Kelly, make money for their appearances, from workshops, and from interfacing directly with their readers. Updike points out that he rarely encountered one of his readers in the first 10 or 15 years after his work started being published. He also waxes eloquent on the joy of visiting bookstores, although not as eloquently as I could wax. Or perhaps, just as eloquently but in a different way.
The tactile experience of reading is not to be dismissed. Although I probably wouldn't have had the patience to slit the pages of a book two by two, I can certainly understand, given the weight and quality of the paper on which those books were printed and bound in their signatures, that for those a little less impatient than me, there was a ceremonial aspect to sitting at a lovely solid wood desk and carefully slicing along the folded edge with a utensil dedicated for this purpose. As one of my 18th and 19th Century lit profs said, in the days before television, reading was considered entertainment for the literate masses, and those who had the leisure to read at all were not daunted by the prospect of a long novel - they were, rather, delighted by the prospect of one that would occupy their leisure time for many days to come.
A real book is also portable, and while it's not difficult to imagine that technology will soon devise tiny perfect little optical readers that can be grabbed on the way out the door just like a book, they will NOT be just like books. Having worked in more than one bookstore on more than one occasion, I can tell you that for those who are passionate about reading, every shipment is like Christmas. In fact, the last time I worked in a bookstore I was forbidden to go anywhere near the shipments unless I was prepared to actually receive and shelve the books, since I'd fallen into the bad habit of opening all the totes, exclaiming with joy, and leaving a huge mess behind me. The design factor is not to be discounted in the book publishing industry - and frankly, web design has a long way to go before it can catch up with the sophistication of the book and magazine industries design capabilities (mainly because just about anyone can get some sort of web site up and going these days, regardless of their lack of comprehension of typography, graphic elements, and what constitutes good design, coupled with a blissful ignorance of its basic premise, The Golden Rule). I have seen books without even a title on their front covers fly off the shelves - there was a series of naughty books by a guy called John Colleton in the 70s that regularly disappeared in moments after being shelved based on their covers alone.
The prospect of reading even more megapixels isn't an appealing one. Even the experience of buying books online, convenient though it is, isn't as much fun as browsing in a bookstore. Nor am I anywhere near as likely to buy a book by an unknown author online, no matter how good its reviews. I certainly can't imagine buying a dozen or more books by authors unknown to me online. And yet I had no hesitation whatsoever to scoop up at least two dozen in the Virago women's writers series when they were on sale at David Mirvish Books in Toronto a decade or two ago. The covers, the chance to glance at the first paragraph, the fact that they were all on sale for less than half price - I was sold in no time. And I read every one of them too. The online book buying experience has really only one consolation for me - I have usually forgotten that I've placed an order by the time the books arrive, and thus conclude it's either my birthday or Christmas when they do magically appear. That's the point at which I get a little bit of the same excitement I get by fondling and poring over them in an actual store, accepting or rejecting them based on their covers, their first paragraphs, the back jacket blurb - and the amount of show-through in the paper on which they're printed. Buying online will also never give the joy of that spontaneous exchange of information called a conversation, either - the sort of conversation that often happens in the retail outlet when the person you're paying for the book has read it him- or herself - or the person in the line behind you spots it over your shoulder and tells you how much you're going to enjoy it. These conversations can take place wherever you go with your actual, real, live, fondle-able, tearable, write-in-able book, when someone sees you carrying it and you're suddenly embarked - often in the most unlikely places - on an oral ramble through the merits of the latest Peter Carey, My Life as a Fake, versus his earlier work, like Oscar and Lucinda or even - gasp - The Illywhacker.
It's a peculiar form of intellectual democracy when you feel you are constrained from speaking to someone because their ears are plugged with little headsets. What will happen when we can no longer make eye contact with our fellow public transit users because their eyes are also engaged in reading the text (downloaded from the internet and custom-selected by them) that's scrolling past (speed adjustable of course)?
"The printed, bound and paid-for book was — still is, for the moment — more exacting, more demanding [than information posted on the internet], of its producer and consumer both. It is the site of an encounter, in silence, of two minds, one following in the other's steps but invited to imagine, to argue, to concur on a level of reflection beyond that of personal encounter, with all its merely social conventions, its merciful padding of blather and mutual forgiveness. Book readers and writers are approaching the condition of holdouts, surly hermits who refuse to come out and play in the electronic sunshine of the post-Gutenberg village," says Updike. It's precisely because I want to read a book in the sunshine that I won't be giving up buying books anytime soon.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
